Poster | Thread |
Metalheart
| |
Re: Amiga Inc v. Hyperion VOF - July 21, 2008 edition Posted on 30-Jul-2008 18:25:19
| | [ #101 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 21-Aug-2003 Posts: 2969
From: Somewhere in the Dutch mountains.... | | |
|
| I am SO VERY VERY VERY curious about how this all will end !
I'm not only waiting full anticipation for the end of this, just to get Amiga things starting up again, but also just as much waiting for what would be te outcome, whatever it is. Just to know...
Mart _________________ Theres a time to live and a time to die When its time to meet the maker Theres a time to live but isnt it strange That as soon as you're born you're dying |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Lou
| |
Re: Amiga Inc v. Hyperion VOF - July 21, 2008 edition Posted on 30-Jul-2008 19:19:48
| | [ #102 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 2-Nov-2004 Posts: 4169
From: Rhode Island | | |
|
| @umisef
I think one issue is where in one place, the $25,000 is declared for ownership but in the Annex, the Friedens are also to be paid some rate for the actual work. So it seems to me that even if Amiga Wherever paid the $25,000 (or mutually agreed upon $24,750), they are still not paying the Friedens (and other contractors) for their work who own the modified sources...
So it seems to me, the $25,000 sum was Hyperion's management/ownership fee and additionally Hyperion feels Amiga Je ne sais quo needs to pay for the contract work...
The sources are the issue here. Amiga can own the OS, but not the source code to it.
Perhaps Amiga is finally realizing that for all the lawyers they have hired, they could have just paid off the money for the contract work that Hyperion is asking for.
I myself ran into a similar situation with a mechanic who had my car in a lein despite the fact that he damaged it and never completed the agreed upon work. I never paid him the extra money, but if I had it would have been way less than what I paid the scoundrel...err...I mean lawyer to get it back from the grease monkey... |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
jorkany
| |
Re: Amiga Inc v. Hyperion VOF - July 21, 2008 edition Posted on 30-Jul-2008 20:36:16
| | [ #103 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 1-May-2005 Posts: 920
From: Space Coast | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
stevieu
| |
Re: Amiga Inc v. Hyperion VOF - July 21, 2008 edition Posted on 30-Jul-2008 21:41:02
| | [ #104 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 23-Apr-2003 Posts: 647
From: England, UK | | |
|
| @jorkany
Quote:
Well, it looks like it might end in a settlement sometime in October: |
Interesting.
For the pessimists, that would probably mean a settlement talk, then another 5 years of court hearings
But let's hope for a settlement of some sort. Well, more precisely, of the positive sort.
Steve_________________ A1200T - OS4.0,OS3.9: 603e PPC 200mhz,060 50mhz, 256mb ram, FastATA MK-III, BVision, 160gb,20gb HDDs
A1200 - OS3.1: Blizzard IV 030, 64mb ram, 400mb HDD
OS4.x - Flying the AMIGA flag |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Colin_Camper
| |
Re: Amiga Inc v. Hyperion VOF - July 21, 2008 edition Posted on 30-Jul-2008 21:49:42
| | [ #105 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 6-Jul-2003 Posts: 1188
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @jorkany
Sounds like Alan Redhouse is off on an extended summer holiday until the end of september.
Maybe he bought a motorhome (RV to you yanks!) with his A1 sales and is touring France! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
PulsatingQuasar
| |
Re: Amiga Inc v. Hyperion VOF - July 21, 2008 edition Posted on 30-Jul-2008 22:03:37
| | [ #106 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 10-Mar-2003 Posts: 550
From: The Netherlands, Europe | | |
|
| @Colin_Camper
I think the only thing he got from the A1 experience is an ulcer.
I hope this ends well. _________________ AmigaOne-XE G3 OS 4. A4000 PPC A1200 PPC |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
CodeSmith
| |
Re: Amiga Inc v. Hyperion VOF - July 21, 2008 edition Posted on 30-Jul-2008 22:14:18
| | [ #107 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 8-Mar-2003 Posts: 3045
From: USA | | |
|
| @stevieu
A settlement of any sort would be good, even if it means the death of OS4 we'll finally know where we stand.
I'm hoping beyond hope that Amiga Inc has realized that it's much better to be collecting royalties from Hyperion, than it is to be paying the (not exactly cheap) people who are working to make sure they never collect a cent from Hyperion.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Leo
| |
Re: Amiga Inc v. Hyperion VOF - July 21, 2008 edition Posted on 30-Jul-2008 23:54:15
| | [ #108 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 21-Aug-2003 Posts: 1597
From: Unknown | | |
|
| Well.. I don't know how this will end.. But what's sure is that it will have a big negative impact on what's left about the Amiga... ie: AmigaOS (classic & NG)... This stupid trial hurts both, not allowing anyone to correctly develop and *spread* Amiga solutions... not to mention the negative image of the Amiga (which was already low, weak, and old)...
As the lawyer initially said, both should have found an agreement instead... But I guess only in the Amiga community people prefer killing each other than cooporeating, which would mean making concessions (something not present into the Amiga's vocabulary...) but also surviving (something the Amiga doesn't care: it's better to keep working toward your personnal interests)...
Commodore didn't need Microsoft to kill itself...
Amiga/Hyperion won't need Microsoft either to kill themselves... Last edited by Leo on 31-Jul-2008 at 12:21 AM. Last edited by Leo on 31-Jul-2008 at 12:17 AM.
_________________ http://www.warpdesign.fr/ |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
umisef
| |
Re: Amiga Inc v. Hyperion VOF - July 21, 2008 edition Posted on 31-Jul-2008 4:41:33
| | [ #109 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 19-Jun-2005 Posts: 1714
From: Melbourne, Australia | | |
|
| @fairlanefastback
Quote:
I've read the court docs, which is mind numbing enough at times. |
And yet, you failed to take in Olaf's rather explicit statement that he made a copy of the 3.1 sources for Ray Akey of Amiga Inc, right? Because otherwise, you, too, would have been part of the "we" which knows better than to make silly claims about AI not having 3.1 sources to deliver.
Quote:
You can go shove your "flapping your lips" and "is disingenuous" garbage |
You were either disingenuous, or had were commenting on things which you *should* and *could* have known about, but didn't.
What's worse, you did so in a manner which suggested to the reader that you *did* know what you were talking about, rather than speculated. Accuse me of using "inside knowledge" all you want, but what you stated directly contradicted the public court docs, which you claim to have read.
Fact is, AI had the sources, as a matter of record. Fact is also that Olaf has, as a matter of record, acknowledged the (Amino) AI's ownership of the original 3.1, and that thus Olaf providing the original 3.1 sources to anyone else can only happen with the permission of and as an agent for the owner of said sources.
And last but not least, fact is that Olaf was *not* paid anything for those original 3.1 sources (the ones you claim Amiga had to supply, but couldn't, thus forcing Hyperion to spend extra money on Olaf). Olaf was (supposed to be) paid (a) for his improvements, and (b) for his CVS hosting duties, as well as (separately) for his contributions to OS4 (TCP/IP stack, FFS, probably others). Again, a matter of record.
So the whole line of argument that you revived was stupid from the very start, because the publicly available documents show it to contradict the facts. Reviving it in the context of "what if AI never owned 3.1?" doesn't make it any less stupid. Quite the contrary, IMO.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
fairlanefastback
| |
Re: Amiga Inc v. Hyperion VOF - July 21, 2008 edition Posted on 31-Jul-2008 5:56:47
| | [ #110 ] |
|
|
|
Team Member |
Joined: 22-Jun-2005 Posts: 4886
From: MA, USA | | |
|
| @umisef
I know you want to draw me into some quote fest from a bunch of the 115 entries and myriad documents attached to them. You may have a permanent white board up in your living room to track the he said / she said in every document. And maybe you keep re-reading them for fun often. I don't. Filing 26 said they needed to enter into a separate agreement with Olaf to get 3.1 sources dating back to 1994. As I mentioned before, if AI had the 3.1 sources its even worse, as they were required to produce them. They also were required to produce 3.5 and 3.9, and again in filing 26 because they did not Hyperion said they had to enter into dozens of other agreements with related developers in its place because Amiga, though promising such code had never secured it from H&P. If I am not recalling something that is pertinent that was proved out otherwise you can simply share it. Whats so bloody difficult about that?
I pity you for the fact that you seem to have some need to feel superior on a message board, throwing around "stupid", "disingenuous", etc so lightly. You do such things when conversing with many people on here. Its sad really. The worse shame of it is you appear to be technically brilliant in products you have made. But thats no excuse for being that plain rude. Last edited by fairlanefastback on 31-Jul-2008 at 06:01 AM. Last edited by fairlanefastback on 31-Jul-2008 at 06:00 AM. Last edited by fairlanefastback on 31-Jul-2008 at 05:58 AM.
_________________ Pegasos2 G3 running AOS 4.1 and MorphOS 2.0 Amikit user, tinkering with Icaros VM (AROS) EFIKA owner Amiga 1200 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
SpaceDruid
| |
Re: Amiga Inc v. Hyperion VOF - July 21, 2008 edition Posted on 31-Jul-2008 8:55:39
| | [ #111 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 12-Jan-2007 Posts: 1748
From: Inside the mind of a cow on a planet that's flying through space at 242.334765 miles per second. | | |
|
| Hey you two. Shut up this childish bickering before I get mad. And you won't like me when I'm mad.
(I wear pants on my head and stick pencils up my nostrils while shouting "wibble")
_________________ "Anyone with a modicum of reasonableness may realize that it is like comparing the ride in the world to descend the stairs to catch the milk in the house."
Google Translate |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
itix
| |
Re: Amiga Inc v. Hyperion VOF - July 21, 2008 edition Posted on 31-Jul-2008 10:33:51
| | [ #112 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 22-Dec-2004 Posts: 3398
From: Freedom world | | |
|
| @fairlanefastback
Quote:
They also were required to produce 3.5 and 3.9, and again in filing 26 because they did not Hyperion said they had to enter into dozens of other agreements with related developers in its place because Amiga, though promising such code had never secured it from H&P.
|
I dont think Amiga Inc could ever acquire full source code to H&P 3.5/3.9 because parts of it were licensed from other developers or contained Aminet stuff. Obviously Amiga Inc could not get the TCP/IP stack from 3.9 (for which H&P failed to pay anyway...), ClassAct (renamed to Reaction) was licensed from someone else, 3.9 didnt have any integrated RTG system, AHI is 3rd party contribution, WarpUp and Warp3D was from H&P and 3.5/3.9 did not add new APIs to the Kickstart. 3.5/3.9 were simply 3.1 repackaged with some Aminet pacthes and tools without any true improvements. Hyperion by not having 3.5/3.9 "sources" they could not lose much there...
_________________ Amiga Developer Amiga 500, Efika, Mac Mini and PowerBook |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
abalaban
| |
Re: Amiga Inc v. Hyperion VOF - July 21, 2008 edition Posted on 31-Jul-2008 11:13:56
| | [ #113 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 1-Oct-2004 Posts: 1114
From: France | | |
|
| @itix
Quote:
3.5/3.9 did not add new APIs to the Kickstart |
That's not completely true, doing a simple Quote:
fgrep -r "(V4" . | grep -v "(V4[)01]" | on the OS 3.9 NDK's autodoc drawer will proves you otherwise, I agree there is not so much (using wc I get at least 160 improvements over 3.1, and that's without taking into account improvements newer than the NDK, i.e. those from the BoingBalls) but hey that was 'only' 3.5 and 3.9 was there so many improvements between 3.0 and 3.1 ?_________________ AOS 4.1 : I dream it, Hyperion did it ! Now dreaming AOS 4.2... Thank you to all devs involved for this great job ! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
itix
| |
Re: Amiga Inc v. Hyperion VOF - July 21, 2008 edition Posted on 31-Jul-2008 12:00:04
| | [ #114 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 22-Dec-2004 Posts: 3398
From: Freedom world | | |
|
| @abalaban
Lets see... Workbench got few nice additions (and admittely WB was updated for 3.9) but after that there are only very few improvements. Reaction is nearly same as ClassAct and there are only cosmetic changes to datatypes and ASL. Enhanced picture.dt was already available at Aminet, so were various ASL replacements. AVL trees are new APIs but H&P screwed it up of course by inserting those functions to Exec where it does not really belong.
3.9 had also large disk support which is bonus but more or less "they made it and H&P screwed it up" But I am terribly offtopic here...
_________________ Amiga Developer Amiga 500, Efika, Mac Mini and PowerBook |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|